Compare | ||
Compare All Features Differing |
Side by Side Comparison of: KAYIZU vs Hanes
Learn More | ||
Learn More | ||
Rating info | ||
eComparisons Score | ||
eComparisons ScoreThe "Comparison Score" Is calculated based on the average number of times this item was compared with other items in this category by our users | 7.8 | 8.8 |
User Rating (Amazon) | ||
User Rating (Amazon) | ||
Five Star Reviews: | 45% Nice. Maybe a little feminine but as long as ... March 11, 2016 Nice. Maybe a little feminine but as long as you have the body to pull it off. We'll see how they hold up in the wash. GREAT look and feel, sexy but not femme. November 16, 2015 Great fit for US medium. Wonderful sexy look and feel, sheer material allows your package to be seen right through the undies. The cut holds you snug and close but climbs up the butt a bit. Not a wedgie really just high on the cheek. I am ordering more on payday! don't know your wearing them August 31, 2015 Love these. Comfortable, good fit, and feels like you're wearing nothing. Can't beat the price either. | 67% Boys... le sigh. October 5, 2017 What is it with men wearing their underwear until theyre holey where there arent supposed to be holes? Bought these boxers for a friend of mine... Boy had holes in all his old boxers and even though he said not to, I bought these for him anyway. They fit wonderfully. Thin boxers September 20, 2017 Very nice boxers... I'm gradually replacing my entire collection of boxers with these. I like the variety pack. They feel very cool, and fit great. There are no tags ... I don't know. They are great. The fabric is thin and not weirdly slippery like spandex or something. A great way to refresh your boxer drawer. August 20, 2017 I like these boxers. The patterns and colors are nice. The elastic waist is comfortable with just the right amount of stretch. The fit is true to size (XL = 40 - 42 inch waistband). The ten pack is a real bargain. Highly recommended. Best underwear ever! June 22, 2017 Hubby loves this underwear! Says it's the softest & most comfortable he's ever had. He also loves the fact that it's tagless. I'm amazed at the really great quality for the price. |
Four Star Reviews: | 26% ... is 33-34) and tried mine on and it's very comfortable and cool March 2, 2016 I ordered medium (my waist size is 33-34) and tried mine on and it's very comfortable and cool. But BE AWARE: On the package itself, medium size is listed as it's for waist size 28-30, while on this website's size chart from product information, medium is listed as 32-34. The product itself is very stretchy and comfortable so I'm honestly satisfied with the product itself, so I'm taking one star off for the error in the size chart.*****Seller: Please update your size chart.***** Great Fit, very lightweight and comfortable. September 30, 2015 Very comfortable, nice fit, exactly as I expected. Like 'em, the wife likes 'em July 30, 2015 Like 'em, the wife likes 'em, should have gotten one size bigger because they get a bit uncomfortable after an extended period as parts try to squeeze out the sides. | 17% Decent, wish there was a button or snap on the fly. September 7, 2017 They feel a little scratchy, but that's to make them cooler and not stick to your skin, it's ok. Only wish they put a button or snap on the fly. I have 'escape' issues.... gonna have to buy a snap kit and install some snaps to fix them all. Too big but good quality July 21, 2017 Nice set of boxers, but the sizes don't seem right (the size chart was wrong when I purchased). I normally buy Large sized boxers but these are definitely too big for my 34" waist. High quality and long lasting. Be sure to get the right size! It's like underwear made from the same material as a dress ... May 23, 2017 These are not at all stretchy. It's like underwear made from the same material as a dress shirt. Sizes were right, just did not like the material it was from. Run small but are still great April 20, 2017 These are great but they run small so consider going up a size if you are usually between two sizes. For instance I wear things that are small or medium. I should have gone w a medium size though these do fit they are a little snug. Good undies March 16, 2017 These undies are about the right length for me and are not too full in the seat. The fabric is very light, but I don't think that is a problem. Replacing old favorite Jockey with Hanes June 29, 2016 Withheld a star because I've had these only a month or so and I'm worried about Hanes length of wear. I used to have--and love--Jockey brand boxers, but, man, the last two sets of that brand I bought (I've been loyal to Jockey for 30 years) were lousy. The waist band wore out after about 5 washings. In the old days, I had Jockeys that lasted 15 years or more. Seriously. They probably lowered the quality so they WOULD wear out sooner. So now it's Hanes for me ... unless they don't last either. So far these boxers are very comfortable and look pretty good (even with my legs). The fit is just right. |
Three Star Reviews: | 22% Gay Bar Boy Realness February 16, 2017 Great colors. But definitely should of gotten a size bigger. I don't feel crunched, but I have a bigger butt so it kinda slid up and my cheeks would be visible underneath. Great if your a gay bar boy. Made from a spandex like material that is ok comfort wise September 21, 2016 Not cotton. Made from a spandex like material that is ok comfort wise. Very breathable. March 12, 2016 The colors are great, but they shrink pretty bad after washing. The material is also kind of see through. ... not what I was expecting the quality is very poor. October 7, 2015 Is not what I was expecting the quality is very poor. Three Stars September 15, 2015 Comfortable, but much more sheer than the picture would indicate. Perfect for hot weather! ... it's made for men with no backside or front like Asians they gap in the front and ride up ... August 28, 2015 I'll give it three stars for price light weight fanric and decent construction not designit's made for men with no backside or front like Asiansthey gap in the front and ride up in the back . I'm a 31 inch waste and ordered the large, mabe I should have order XLanyway the r cool in this heat. I will use them on vacation as disposables. it's sad because the fabric is decent but the design is for a totally different body type than mine. | 8% Too thin, too tight in thighs August 26, 2017 The size is just wierd. It fits well in the waist, but very tight in the thighs compared to other brands. The materials is very thin as well, too thin. After a few washes they feel like my son has worn them for months June 23, 2017 Truly medium quality. After a few washes they feel like my son has worn them for months. Order bigger 😬 June 10, 2017 Very comfortable, yet I ordered the large & they are bit snug. I'm hoping they don't shrink to much😅😤👍 Fine for Big Bottoms April 28, 2017 There was no description on the package or the website in regards to the style. These are definitely Classic Boxers, meaning they have the big panel in the butt, making them too big in the butt for a man with a normal or flat butt.I was expecting boxers with the single seam in the back. Low quality but suits my needs February 28, 2017 Hanes are always a tad thin for their material but "you get what you pay for" so not bad for 5 pair. Boxers fit great and the patterns were nice as well November 27, 2016 Boxers fit great and the patterns were nice as well. The fabric seems to be holding up well and the elastic is still strong. My only gripe about this is the way the rear is sewn together. Instead of one seams straight down the back side, it has two seems which arch along your bum. This makes it feel funny, like you're almost wearing a diaper and that was enough for me to take it down two stars. It's hella weird. |
Two Star Reviews: | 7% Thongs "R" Us October 12, 2015 If you love a thong-style brief, then these are the underwear you will adore! You get what you pay for. October 11, 2015 2 stars only because they are VERY soft and actually do look VERY NICE on. However, they're pretty much UNWEARABLE due to the fact that they're cut VERY small and uncomfortably (only) in the front area. I couldn't imagine wearing these for more than a hour or 2 without getting some serious chafing. | 4% Not super soft April 26, 2017 Not as comfortable as I was hoping for. Stop putting polyester in boxers! Nice designs, but very cheap so poorly made you ... April 20, 2017 Nice designs, but very cheap so poorly made you can see through both layers (front and back) when holding them in front of you. You don't wanna know.... November 13, 2016 How can I say this? The fly is too small or maybe it's positioned too high. There's a slight pressure on the underside of "it" when urinating and it restricts a bit of the flow, only to release it upon "tucking in". There are Two Seams in the Back!!! June 6, 2016 There are two seams on the back of the boxers, which is a ridiculous design to me. Your motion is restrained every time you pick up your leg because there's a seam that runs against your butt, and it's quite irritating. Had to return these. Still incredulous as to how someone who had tried on the boxers would think that's a good design. Web site wrong November 8, 2015 2X is listed as 46" - 48" for regular boxer shorts, what came was 2X 44: - 46". The size information for regular boxer shorts is incorrect. It was correct for boxer briefs but that is not what I ordered and boxer briefs is not what I got. I received the correct regular boxer's but obviously 2X is not 46" - 48" as claimed on web site size chart. I an very disappointed because I am in need of underwear. Old fat men should not go around without underwear. We just don't look good naked anymore. |
One Star Reviews: | 0% There are no reviews yet | 4% I buy the exact same ones and same exact size ... May 31, 2017 I buy the exact same ones and same exact size from walmart and they fit.Come on here and and trying to save a buck and its tight. Leg openings/cut on the XL are way too wide! March 9, 2017 No good unless you like boxers that are way too wide and frumpy looking. Took one out of the package they're not what I was expecting. I could no imagine these being comfortable at all September 10, 2016 The Size in the product description says a M is for 34-36 waist. The actual product packaging says M fits 32-34. I wear either a 34 or 36 in everything I own and could not get these things over my hips. On top of that, I could no imagine these being comfortable at all. Very stiff cotton almost crispy like paper. No thanks. uncomfortable April 17, 2016 For some reason these boxers have extra stitching that really only works to bind and restrict. I got the XXL size but to be honest I still have XL boxers of different varieties that all fit me better than these. I will never buy these boxers again. I've actually started to take them off before I go to sleep just so I can get comfortable enough. For some reason these under-wears where somewhat shorter and tighter ... September 28, 2015 For some reason these under-wears where somewhat shorter and tighter than the other underwear's i have from different brands .. and there are no buttons in the front , just an opening , sometimes when i remove my pants or jeans .. my junior pops out lol |
Vote for Me | Vote for Me | |
Pricing info | ||
Old Price | ||
Old Price | - | - |
Price | ||
Price | $12.99updated: Mar 13, 2020 | $18.48updated: Mar 11, 2020 |
Features | ||
Article Number | ||
Article Number | 6838962589011 | 0616073645323 |
Binding | ||
Binding | Apparel | Apparel |
Brand | ||
Brand | KAYIZU | Hanes |
ClothingSize | ||
ClothingSize | Medium | Large |
Color | ||
Color | Black/Blue/Purple/Yellow/Green/White(6 Pack) | Assorted |
Department | ||
Department | mens | mens |
Height | ||
Height | 70.9 in | 39.4 in |
Length | ||
Length | 287.4 in | 511.8 in |
Product Group | ||
Product Group | Apparel | Apparel |
Product Type | ||
Product Type | UNDERWEAR | UNDERWEAR |
Reviews | ||
Reviews | ||
Score | ||
Score | 8 | 8.6 |
Size | ||
Size | Medium | Large |
Weight | ||
Weight | 1.1 oz | 2.8 oz |
Width | ||
Width | 252.0 in | 315.0 in |
Feature | ||
Feature | Fabric: 93% Ice silk + 7% spandex Natural upright U convex three-dimensional space, comfortable all day. 3cm waist wide-brimmed design, comfortable, no marks, no shackles Good fabric, very cool,soft, breathable,suitable for summer wear,protection of Men's Health Tailored specifically for the US men, sexy, soft and cool. | The improved fit is why we call these best fit boxers, basic style with traditional fly front that's guaranteed not to gap Double-stitched seams for added durability Roomier cut for comfort, stylish, comes in assorted plaids Comfort flex waistband moves with you and keeps its shape wash after wash |
Hanes Men's 5 Pack Ultimate...
Hanes Men's 7 Pack Ultimate...
Nylon Stretchable Compression...
Fruit of the Loom Men's Basic...
Hanes Men's 7-pack Briefs,...
Mens 6pk Seamless Athletic...
Hanes Men's 5-Pack Tagless,...
Kayizu Men's Underwear...
Calvin Klein Men's 3-Pack Cotton...
Hanes Men's 5 Pack Ultimate...